Eight Warning Signs of a Bad School

How do parents find a good school? Not only areAll of these stand in direct contrast to direct instruction,
public schools crippled by dozens of bad ideas, but thewhereby expert teachers teach what they know
schools seem intentionally designed so that parentsbetter than anyone else in the room. "A sage on a
cannot understand what's really going on inside thestage" is exactly what children need. Constructivism
classrooms. Probably it's more practical to stay alertdevalues the skill and preparation that good teachers
for the danger signs that can be observed from abring to the schoolroom; and helps to conceal the poor
distance. Here's a checklist of the top eight signals thattraining of bad teachers. Constructivism guarantees
you don't want your child in this school:that instruction will move slowly and be fragmented.
1) READING: The most important skill is reading. If you6) FADS RUN RAMPANT: Other popular fads to be
hear any mention of Whole Words, Sight Words, Dolchavoided include: Self Esteem (where children are
Words, Fry Words, or Balanced Literacy, run the otherconstantly praised and awarded good grades even if
way. English is in alphabetic/phonetic language, anddoing a bad job); Cooperative Learning (where children
should be taught phonetically. Children mustare constantly forced to work in groups so they never
immediately learn the alphabet, and that letters standlearn to think for themselves); Critical Thinking (where
for sounds. (There seem to be five or 10 good phonicschildren are encouraged to engage in deep discussions
programs available. I'm not convinced the smallof subjects they know little about); Creativity
differences matter. What's been killing us is this one bigCurriculum (where playing with the arts is given
difference: teaching basic alphabetic information orprominence over learning knowledge); and Fuzzy
NOT teaching it. Any synthetic phonics program, mixedAnything (where children are allowed to guess, to
with poetry, song, and a light touch, seems to do theconcoct odd spellings and odd grammar without
trick. Advocates of phonics report that virtually all theircorrection, to be wrong but still be graded as if
students learn to read by age 7. Advocates of Wholecorrect). All of these are warning signs.
Word say children should memorize a few hundred7) GOALS: Perhaps the most distinctive trait of good
words each year, in which case they'll be effectivelyschools is that they talk about what will be taught and
illiterate through high school.)what will be accomplished. There are goals and
2) MATH: The next most important thing is arithmetic. Ifexpectations. There is a sense that the school has a
you hear any mention of Reform Math, run the othermap and has traveled the road many times before.
way. (Reform Math is an umbrella term for at least 10Bad schools are distinguished by an endless litany of
different programs, with names such as Everydayexcuses and alibis. There is a sense that these
Math, Connected Math, MathLand, TERC, CPM, etc.)schools don't have clear goals, and they don't really
These programs tend to push advanced concepts atexpect to advance very far. In bad schools, a lot of
children who don't even know how to add 10 and 16.what happens is actually a sort of make-believe
These programs like to use obscure methods andwhereby children are kept busy doing pretend-work
algorithms so that children end up confused andthat doesn't add up to very much. Perhaps the most
scattered. The proper goal is that children gaindisgusting part of the whole charade is that some of
mastery of basic arithmetic, for example, easily addingthese schools will pretend that they are being
and subtracting one- and two-digit numbers. Then theyconsiderate of the children, that they don't want to
move on to multiplying and dividing one- and two-digitpush them too far, and they don't want to expose the
numbers. There should be no use of calculators, noinadequacies of poor and minority children. All of this, it
"spiraling" about from topic to topic, no mention ofseems to me, is the merest drivel, not to mention racist.
college-level concepts.Children need to be challenged and pushed, not to the
3) KNOWLEDGE: The next most important thing ispoint where they give up but to the point where they
that children are routinely expected to acquirethink, "Wow, look at me go."
knowledge. This used to be ordinary; but for 75 years8) SAFETY: A signal that cuts across all the others
our educators have waged war against content, facts,might be called basic orderliness and security. Schools
and memorization. "They can look it up" is a hugeshould be safe places, both law-abiding and predictable.
danger signal. To study history, for example, requiresThe point is that children should be able to relax so
that children first learn the names of oceans,they can learn. A scary school ceases to be a school.
continents, rivers, mountains, and countries. BasicThe Principal (comparable to a small town's Mayor and
geography should be a staple throughout the first fewSheriff) is a crucial figure in this paradigm: he or she
years; there should be maps in every classroom, bothsets the tone. Principals explain goals and policies to
of the US and the world. In general, in all subjects,students and parents; principals motivate and support
children should first be taught the very simplestteachers. (This might be called the Principal Principle.)
information, the essentials, the foundational knowledge,Summary: The Tao of Education is very simple.
all in preparation for studying the subject at a higherLearning basics and academics is the goal, and the
level. If children do not learn the names of the oceanspath to that goal. Facts and knowledge are the
in the first grade, they are not at a school but alifeblood of the classroom. Teaching should be as
babysitting service.creative as possible; schools should be fun and student
4) SCIENCE: Children should be taught, from the start,should smile a lot. But the whole process has to go
the rudiments of science and scientific thinking. Forsomewhere, has to advance. At the end of each day,
example, children can look at common objects andstudents know more than they did the day before.
say whether they are animal, vegetable or mineral.The problem with American education is that elite
Children should be able to talk about water changingeducators shifted away from knowledge-based
from solid to liquid to steam. Older children should beeducation (a/k/a cognitive learning) toward
able to discuss the different kinds of problems dealtfeeling-based education (a/k/a affective learning).
with by doctors, chemists, biologists, physicists,A lot of psychotherapeutic prejudices were mixed in
mathematicians, etc. Studying simple maps, diagrams,with a contempt for facts and a disregard of
charts, illustrations and blueprints is a good sign. (Put itfoundational knowledge, including even literacy. The
another way, I can't imagine that a bad school wouldresult, as one would expect, would be a very
think of teaching children to understand simpledumbed-down, mediocre school, such you might find in
diagrams in first grade.)any American city. The solution is to ignore the bad
5) CONSTRUCTIVISM: One of the big fads raging inideas that caused the trouble, turn away from the
some public schools is called constructivism. (It can turntouchy-feely cliches, and seriously try to render service
up in the teaching of any subject.) The giveaways areto students by giving them the best possible
phrases such as "construct new knowledge," "guide atpreparation for the rest of their lives.
their side," "prior knowledge," "learning strategies," etc.