Societal Views and Perceptions on Divorce

With the implementation of Women's Rightsbelief that there is a strong associations between
movements in the 19th century, and the enactment ofmany indicators of child well-being and living with two
no-fault divorce statues in the 20th century, the divorcemarried biological parents. Others argue that unstable
rates skyrocketed, and continues climb. This hasmarriage may not provide the same positive
resulted in family disruptions, economic hardships andoutcomes as stable marriages. For example, studies
family crisis. After divorce, women usually remain thereveal that children who live in stressful environments
custodial parent of their children, however, theyas a result of their parents unstable marriages develop
experience financial struggles and parenting difficultiesinsecure attachments.
due to the absence of a second adult in the home.Divorce reform has also become a major political and
Moreover, many divorced mothers struggle to receivesocial agenda. Although many individuals believe that a
monetary support from their ex-husbands, evendecrease in the divorce rate will promote the
towards the care of their children.well-being of families in general, and result in positive
With the primary focus being on the well-being ofpolitical and social outcomes, this writer suggests that
children, a Marriage Movement was established inlaws alone cannot determine marital behavior, and that
order to address the high prevalence of divorce. Thenot all marriages are worthy of saving. In some
initiative has funded programs that promote marriageinstances marriage promotion might prolong violent and
through the implementation of agendas directed atabusive situations, placing individuals at risk and further
marriage preparation and enhancement, and by puttingcompromising the well-being of children. Moreover, the
other systems in place to encourage more couples toguilt and moral condemnation that marriage promotion
get married. Policymakers anticipated that theefforts may place on those desiring a divorce, can
successful implementation of the initiative would benefitfurther exacerbate an unstable marital relationship.
children most by allowing them to continue to live withAccording to estimates, almost one half of all
their biological parents instead of alternative familymarriages will ultimately end in divorce. It therefore
structures.The effort to promote marriage has beenseems counterproductive to continue to only focus on
linked to the well-being of children because publicpromoting marriage, and not find ways to make
opinion and research findings have suggests thatdivorce more amicable for the parties involved. Since
children who live with their married parents do betterincreasing the well-being of children is the alleged goal
than those in other types of family arrangements.of the marriage promoters, it would seem logical that
Research findings have also suggested that living in ansome effort would be made to help the divorce
alternative family arrangement, particularly inprocess to be less of a traumatic experience for
single-mother households, can reduce the monetarychildren. Additionally by demonizing divorce ,
resources, parental time and material resources thatpolicymakers are encouraging the stigmatization of
are available to children, thus placing them at athose who are divorced, and the endorsing practices
disadvantage.that would prevent them from obtaining the social and
Those who advocate for marriage promotion andeconomic resources that they need to adequately
marriage enhancement policies do so based on thesupport themselves and their children.